Several studies have been conducted to test the effectiveness of praying for others. The most comprehensive and rigorous of these was the
 Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) project,
 which tested the notion that praying for sick patients improved their 
health. STEP was a double-blind study that involved 1,800 patients who 
had received coronary bypass surgery. Neither the patients nor their 
doctors were allowed to know which patients were prayed for and which 
were not. The patients were divided into several groups. Group 1 
received prayers and didn’t know it. Group 2 received no prayers and 
didn’t know it. Group 3 received prayers and did know it. This third 
group was not subjected to the double-blind testing standard, but was 
important to the study nonetheless for examining any possible 
psychosomatic effects of prayer. Three separate churches in different 
parts of the country provided the prayers.
The results of the test were reported in the April 2006 American Heart Journal.
 According to the findings of this study, there was no difference 
between patients who were prayed for and those who were not (Groups 1 
and 2). (Patients who received no prayers actually fared slightly better
 than patients who did, but the difference was deemed too small to be of
 any significance.) There was, however, a noticeable difference between 
those who knew they had been prayed for and those who did not (Group 3 
versus Groups 1 and 2). Those who knew they were prayed for suffered 
significantly more complications than the other patients. This was 
attributed to “performance anxiety.” Patients in Group 3 knew people 
were praying for them and felt pressure to do well. This also convinced 
them that they were so sick a prayer team was needed. After all, one 
doesn’t need prayers for a runny nose or a sore throat.
Thus, instead of bringing comfort, the prayers added extra stress and
 worry for these patients. I suppose the only thing more distressing in 
this scenario would be to find out your own doctor is praying for you.
Is praying to be completely dismissed, then? Should churches and 
other places of worship stop their practice of asking their 
congregations to pray for others?
No. A quote widely attributed to the Danish philosopher Soren 
Kierkegaard seems to sum up the purpose and power of prayer: “The 
function of prayer is not to influence God, but rather to change the 
nature of the one who prays.” In other words, prayer is helpful for the 
one praying, not the one being prayed for. While praying for others 
seems to have no discernible positive effect, there is a wealth of 
evidence that suggests prayer and meditation have beneficial effects on 
the person engaged in these practices.
Prayer, meditation and related practices are conducive to developing a
 positive mental attitude. What is more, numerous studies attest to the 
physical and psychological benefits of such a positive outlook. Better 
concentration and patience, deep relaxation and inner calm, and even 
faster recovery from illness and lower blood pressure are just some of 
the conclusions reached in studies that examined the impact of prayer 
and meditation on the practitioner. Such benefits are worth seeking.
-- Jay Sakashita, MidWeek, 11/12/14
 
No comments:
Post a Comment