Several studies have been conducted to test the effectiveness of praying for others. The most comprehensive and rigorous of these was the
Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) project,
which tested the notion that praying for sick patients improved their
health. STEP was a double-blind study that involved 1,800 patients who
had received coronary bypass surgery. Neither the patients nor their
doctors were allowed to know which patients were prayed for and which
were not. The patients were divided into several groups. Group 1
received prayers and didn’t know it. Group 2 received no prayers and
didn’t know it. Group 3 received prayers and did know it. This third
group was not subjected to the double-blind testing standard, but was
important to the study nonetheless for examining any possible
psychosomatic effects of prayer. Three separate churches in different
parts of the country provided the prayers.
The results of the test were reported in the April 2006 American Heart Journal.
According to the findings of this study, there was no difference
between patients who were prayed for and those who were not (Groups 1
and 2). (Patients who received no prayers actually fared slightly better
than patients who did, but the difference was deemed too small to be of
any significance.) There was, however, a noticeable difference between
those who knew they had been prayed for and those who did not (Group 3
versus Groups 1 and 2). Those who knew they were prayed for suffered
significantly more complications than the other patients. This was
attributed to “performance anxiety.” Patients in Group 3 knew people
were praying for them and felt pressure to do well. This also convinced
them that they were so sick a prayer team was needed. After all, one
doesn’t need prayers for a runny nose or a sore throat.
Thus, instead of bringing comfort, the prayers added extra stress and
worry for these patients. I suppose the only thing more distressing in
this scenario would be to find out your own doctor is praying for you.
Is praying to be completely dismissed, then? Should churches and
other places of worship stop their practice of asking their
congregations to pray for others?
No. A quote widely attributed to the Danish philosopher Soren
Kierkegaard seems to sum up the purpose and power of prayer: “The
function of prayer is not to influence God, but rather to change the
nature of the one who prays.” In other words, prayer is helpful for the
one praying, not the one being prayed for. While praying for others
seems to have no discernible positive effect, there is a wealth of
evidence that suggests prayer and meditation have beneficial effects on
the person engaged in these practices.
Prayer, meditation and related practices are conducive to developing a
positive mental attitude. What is more, numerous studies attest to the
physical and psychological benefits of such a positive outlook. Better
concentration and patience, deep relaxation and inner calm, and even
faster recovery from illness and lower blood pressure are just some of
the conclusions reached in studies that examined the impact of prayer
and meditation on the practitioner. Such benefits are worth seeking.
-- Jay Sakashita, MidWeek, 11/12/14
No comments:
Post a Comment