Friday, February 27, 2015

Leonard Nimoy

LOS ANGELES >> Leonard Nimoy, the actor known and loved by generations of "Star Trek" fans as the pointy-eared, purely logical science officer Mr. Spock, has died.

Nimoy died Friday of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at his Los Angeles home, said his son, Adam Nimoy. He was 83.

Although Nimoy followed his 1966-69 "Star Trek" run with a notable career as both an actor and director, in the public's mind he would always be Spock. His half-human, half-Vulcan character was the calm counterpoint to William Shatner's often-emotional Captain Kirk on one of TV and film's most revered cult series.

"He affected the lives of many," Adam Nimoy said. "He was also a great guy and my best friend."

Asked if his father chafed at his fans' close identification of him with his character, Adam Nimoy said, "Not in the least. He loved Spock."

However, Leonard Nimoy displayed ambivalence to the role in the titles of his two autobiographies, "I Am Not Spock" (1975) and "I Am Spock" (1995).

After "Star Trek" ended, the actor immediately joined the hit adventure series "Mission Impossible" as Paris, the mission team's master of disguises.

He also directed several films, including the hit comedy "Three Men and a Baby" and appeared in such plays as "A Streetcar Named Desire," ''Cat on a Hot Tim Roof," ''Fiddler on the Roof," ''The King and I," ''My Fair Lady" and "Equus." He also published books of poems, children's stories and his own photographs.

But he could never really escape the role that took him overnight from bit-part actor status to TV star, and in a 1995 interview he sought to analyze the popularity of Spock, the green-blooded space traveler who aspired to live a life based on pure logic.

People identified with Spock because they "recognize in themselves this wish that they could be logical and avoid the pain of anger and confrontation," Nimoy concluded.

He became Spock after "Star Trek" creator Gene Roddenberry was impressed by his work in guest appearances on the TV shows "The Lieutenant" and "Dr. Kildare."

The space adventure set in the 23rd century had an unimpressive debut on NBC on Sept. 8, 1966, and it struggled during its three seasons to find an audience other than teenage boys. It seemed headed for oblivion after it was canceled in 1969, but its dedicated legion of fans, who called themselves Trekkies, kept its memory alive with conventions and fan clubs and constant demands that the cast be reassembled for a movie or another TV show.

Trekkies were particularly fond of Spock, often greeting one another with the Vulcan salute and the Vulcan motto, "Live Long and Prosper," both of which Nimoy was credited with bringing to the character. He pointed out, however, that the hand gesture was actually derived from one used by rabbis during Hebraic benedictions.

When the cast finally was reassembled for "Star Trek -- The Motion Picture," in 1979, the film was a huge hit and five sequels followed. Nimoy appeared in all of them and directed two. He also guest starred as an older version of himself in some of the episodes of the show's spinoff TV series, "Star Trek: The Next Generation."

"Of course the role changed my career-- or rather, gave me one," he once said. "It made me wealthy by most standards and opened up vast opportunities. It also affected me personally, socially, psychologically, emotionally. ... What started out as a welcome job to a hungry actor has become a constant and ongoing influence in my thinking and lifestyle."

In 2009, he was back in a new big-screen version of "Star Trek," this time playing an older Spock who meets his younger self, played by Zachary Quinto. Critic Roger Ebert called the older Spock "the most human character in the film."

***

Twelve ways Leonard Nimoy made Spock more human than the rest of us

***

Tributes

[6/28/15] - Shatner interview

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Jon Stewart vs. Fox News

As Jon Stewart's time on the air nears its end, so does his patience for Fox News.

Stewart literally threw down the gauntlet at Fox's feet Wednesday night, proclaiming, "I challenge you, Fox News, to a Lie Off!"

Lately, neither party is pulling any punches in its coverage of the other. Fox News hosts have called "The Daily Show" a clear case of "selective editing" with "no foothold in the facts," while Stewart has said that "even watching [Fox News] is killing me." But Stewart has upped the ante by challenging Fox News to provide any proof that his show has ever lied.

Oh, and Stewart did his homework. Behold: "50 Fox News Lies In 6 Seconds."

[via twitter]

Saturday, February 14, 2015

SNL40 / SNL cast members ranked (141 of them)

141.  Robert Downey, Jr.  (didn't even know he was a cast member)

Also crucial: If you were an SNL player and your feelings get bruised easily, you might want to stop reading now.  [That's because the Rolling Stone writer, Rob Sheffield, sounds like a dick, at least at the beginning.  But you gotta give the guy credit for even knowing the names of all the cast members.]

*** [2/19/15]

The Best and Worst of SNL40 (part 1, part 2)

Norm MacDonald shares his SNL40 experiences (as reported by Rolling Stone)

who was missing?  Dennis Miller, Victoria Jackson, Conan O'Brien, Jula Sweeney, Albert Brooks, Buck Henry, Al Franken, Julia Louis Dreyfuss, Nora Dunn, etc.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Nightwing the series

Nightwing: The Series is a fan-funded mini webseries created by Ismahawk and funded by a Kickstarter campaign that quickly went viral. All the people involved love the source material - it's by the fans for the fans, so please be respectful. It's not meant to be movie theater quality, but the goal was still to get it as close to that as possible.

the trailer

episode 1

Spider-Man coming to the Marvel Cinematic Universe

Sony Pictures Entertainment and Marvel Studios announced today that Sony is bringing Marvel into the amazing world of Spider-Man.

Under the deal, the new Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film from Marvel's Cinematic Universe (MCU). Sony Pictures will thereafter release the next installment of its $4 billion Spider-Man franchise, on July 28, 2017, in a film that will be co-produced by Kevin Feige and his expert team at Marvel and Amy Pascal, who oversaw the franchise launch for the studio 13 years ago. Together, they will collaborate on a new creative direction for the web slinger. Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films.

Marvel and Sony Pictures are also exploring opportunities to integrate characters from the MCU into future Spider-Man films.

The new relationship follows a decade of speculation among fans about whether Spider-Man – who has always been an integral and important part of the larger Marvel Universe in the comic books – could become part of the Marvel Universe on the big screen. Spider-Man has more than 50 years of history in Marvel's world, and with this deal, fans will be able to experience Spider-Man taking his rightful place among other Super Heroes in the MCU.

***

The Spider-Man move has been speculated for some time. Among the fanboy crowd, talk of a partnership between the companies arose last summer after the poor reception of Amazing Spider-Man 2.

Although the movie made $708 million worldwide, it was the lowest of all the franchise entries. More critically, the movie was widely panned by fans. Talks were confirmed when emails leaked during Sony’s hacking crisis although they seemingly broke down in the fall.

***

Now that Spider-Man is a part of Marvel's Cinematic Universe starting with a "new creative direction" slated for July 28th, 2017, Marvel Studios is pushing a number of its films back to make room and avoid competition. The next Thor movie would have gone head-to-head with Spider-Man but is now taking Black Panther's original November 2017 premiere date. In turn, Black Panther is taking Captain Marvel's slot, which in turn is taking Inhumans' slot, which is now slated for July 12th, 2019.

The two-part Avengers: Infinity War movies, however, are not budging. That does change which films happen in between Infinity War and pushes Inhumans to after every other film. Marvel's Cinematic Universe has so far been pretty big about keeping all its films within the same universe — each installment building on the same overarching narrative. Which is to say, there's a good chance that some of Larger Plot Points are now being moved around, and that Inhumans might be the beginning of a new Phase (to use its own parlance).

Here's the full list. Updates are in bold.
  • Avengers: Age of Ultron: May 1, 2015
  • Ant-Man: July 17, 2015
  • Captain America: Civil War: May 6, 2016
  • Doctor Strange: November 4, 2016
  • Guardians of the Galaxy 2: May 5, 2017
  • Spider-Man: July 28th, 2017
  • Thor: Ragnarok: November 3rd, 2017
  • Avengers: Infinity War, Part 1: May 4, 2018
  • Black Panther: July 6th, 2018
  • Captain Marvel: November 2nd, 2018
  • Avengers: Infinity War, Part 2: May 3, 2019
  • Inhumans: July 12, 2019
[via roy]

***

A visual guide to Marvel character movie rights

***

Which Marvel movies has Stan Lee not made a cameo in?

Among them: X2, Elektra, X-Men: First Class, Guardians of the Galaxy

Which has he been in? (enjoying the video from the above Guardians of the Galaxy link):  X-Men, Spider-Man, Daredevil, Hulk (with Lou Ferrigno), Spider-Man 2, Fantastic Four, X-Men: The Last Stand, Spider-Man 3, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, Iron Man (as Hef), The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2 (as Larry King), Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, The Avengers, The Amazing Spider-Man.

This updated list also includes: The Trial of the Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World, Agents of SHIELD, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Guardians of the Galaxy (contradicting the article above), Big Hero 6.

And I recently just saw him on Agent Carter.

And the best is yet to come?

Thursday, February 05, 2015

invisible girlfriend

I dunno.  Sounds a little creepy.

Can you say Lennay Kekua?

I wonder how much these are worth now?  (On sale for only $50.99 plus $6.00 shipping.)

Tuesday, February 03, 2015

vinyl lives

Nearly 8 million old-fashioned vinyl records have been sold this year, up 49% from the same period last year, industry data show. Younger people, especially indie-rock fans, are buying records in greater numbers, attracted to the perceived superior sound quality of vinyl and the ritual of putting needle to groove.

But while new LPs hit stores each week, the creaky machines that make them haven’t been manufactured for decades, and just one company supplies an estimated 90% of the raw vinyl that the industry needs. As such, the nation’s 15 or so still-running factories that press records face daily challenges with breakdowns and supply shortages.

Their efforts point to a problem now bedeviling a curious corner of the music industry. The record-making business is stirring to life — but it’s still on its last legs.

Robert Roczynski ’s dozen employees work overtime at a small factory in Hamden, Conn., to make parts for U.S. record makers struggling to keep abreast of the revived interest in LPs. Roczynski’s firm says orders for steel molds, which give records their flat, round shape, have tripled since 2008.

“They’re trying to bring the industry back, but the era has gone by,” says Roczynski, 67 years old, president of Record Products of America Inc., one of the country’s few suppliers of parts for the industry.

Ryan Raffaelli, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School who studies what he calls “technology re-emergence,” is familiar with this industrial netherworld.

Swiss mechanical watches, fountain pens and independent bookstores all re-emerged from the doldrums by reinventing themselves for consumers and then attracting investment from entrepreneurs, he says.

“The question is whether there’s enough demand for vinyl to make this jump. And it’s too soon to tell,” Raffaelli says.

[via roy, 12/16/14]

Monday, February 02, 2015

popping your own popcorn

Have we really been popping popcorn the wrong way this whole time? I guess it’s time to skip the microwave and give our stovetop a warm welcoming!

This helpful video comes from YouTube user The Domestic Geek, who gives us a firsthand look at how to make easy stovetop-popped popcorn in your home!

*** [1/29/21 from the 1/17/21 Star Advertiser]


Ingredients:

1 teaspoon Flavacol
3 tablespoons At The Movies Popcorn Butter Flavored Popcorn Topping
⅓ cup popcorn kernels
Optional: Additional A.T.M.P.B.F.P.T., warmed (if you like “butter” on your movie popcorn), or melted butter (if you like actual butter)

Steps:

Measure the Flavacol and the lengthily named Popcorn Topping into a heavier-bottomed, 3-quart or larger pot that has a lid. Stir them together thoroughly to make an alarmingly artificial-orange-colored slurry.

Add the popcorn and place over medium-high heat. As the pan heats up and sizzling begins, shake and whirl it occasionally to coat kernels in flavor-country glory and spread them in one layer. Watch for the first pop, feel the excitement, then slam on the lid.

Shake your pan back and forth gently, still on heat, while popping happens, then remove from heat immediately just as it stops — usually less than a minute.

Pour it into a large bowl right away and toss with your eager hands to mix, drizzling on optional “butter” or butter as you wish. 

Eat as soon as possible in a darkened room in front of a good (or good-bad) movie (maybe “Contagion”?). Be sure to have a beverage, for this is the beautifully yellow, very salty popcorn you remember from before the global pandemic when going to the movies was still a thing (maybe make that beverage wine?).

--- Bethany Jean Clement, Seattle Times

Sunday, February 01, 2015

best and worst cities to live in

Toronto and Montreal are the top two best places to live in the world, according to The Economist Intelligence Unit.

The information was revealed as part of a new report called The Safe Cities Index 2015, which also includes an “index of indexes” that averages out the scores of six Economist rankings, including the new one.

Toronto ranked only 8th and Montreal 14th in the new Safe Cities Index, but that was enough to make them highest overall when combined with the magazine’s livability rankings, business environment rankings, cost of living index, democracy index and food security index.

Here are the top 10 best places to live, according to The Economist:

1. Toronto
2. Montreal
3. Stockholm
4. Amsterdam
5. San Francisco
6. Melbourne
7. Zurich
8. Washington, D.C.
9. Sydney
10. Chicago

Here are the bottom 10 best places to live, according to The Economist:

41. Istanbul
42. Delhi
43. Moscow
44. Mumbai
45. Mexico City
46. Riyadh
47. Johannesburg
48. Ho Chi Minh City
49. Tehran
50. Jakarta

[via roy]

long-term care insurance

Morningstar: There have been previous studies about the effectiveness of long-term care insurance, whether it makes sense for people to purchase it, but yours used a slightly different approach. Can you explain what you did that was different?

Anthony Webb: The approach is really sort of a two-step approach. The first step is to actually get the probabilities of going into care right. What we showed is that the previous research has underestimated the probability of needing care but correspondingly overestimated the average length of time that people spend in care. So, the most widely cited piece of previous research says that men and women, age 65, had a lifetime risk of needing nursing-home care of 27% and 44%, respectively. Our new study shows that the risks are, in fact, higher. They are 44% for men and 58% for women. That is the bad news. The good news is that the average duration of stay for those who go into a nursing home is less than previously estimated. [The study pegs this figure at 1.4 years for women and 0.9 years for men, well below the 2 years for women and 1.3 years for men reported in an earlier study.]

Morningstar: So, how do your findings change the standard of advice that is given to people with regard to whether or not long-term care insurance is likely to be worth it for them?

Webb: The practical answer is that a high percentage of people who purchase long-term care insurance lapse their policies prior to the ages at which they are at greatest risk of needing care. And if an individual lapses his policy, the premiums are wasted. So, the first piece of advice I would like to give is that you really shouldn't take out a long-term care insurance policy unless you're very confident that you're able and willing to carry on paying the premiums over the rest of your life. The second comment is that for many individuals of modest means--and I don't mean to sound harsh here--Medicaid may be the least bad option. The reason is that if you're an individual of modest means, the primary beneficiary of your long-term care insurance policy is the government, which benefits in the form of lower Medicaid payments. So, for every dollar that you get in long-term care insurance benefits, the government is saving maybe $0.60, $0.70, or $0.80 in Medicaid benefits.

Morningstar: Some experts say that people don't need long-term care insurance if they have too much or if they have too little, but for people who fall in the middle somewhere, it might make sense.

Webb: Yes, I think that's exactly right, that the very, very rich can self-insure. Those who have very little resources really cannot afford the premiums. It's the people in the middle who have a dilemma.

Morningstar: So, where does that middle fall? Is there a certain income band at which you would say that long-term care insurance would make sense?

Webb: I would be more inclined to express it in terms of assets rather than income and say that the people who have a dilemma are those who maybe have nonhousing assets in the order of $250,000 up to $1 million--and that's a relatively small section of the population.