Thursday, July 30, 2015

it's the real thing

ATLANTA — A viral graphic reportedly shows the effects one can of Coca-Cola has on a person’s body over one hour.

The graphic, titled “What Happens One Hour After Drinking A Can Of Coke,” was first posted by The Renegade Pharmacist. It claims to detail what happens to the body after 10, 20, 40, 45 and 60 minutes.

First 10 minutes: 10 teaspoons of sugar hit your system. (100 percent of your recommended daily intake.) You don’t immediately vomit from the overwhelming sweetness because phosphoric acid cuts the flavor allowing you to keep it down.

20 minutes: Your blood sugar spikes, causing an insulin burst. Your liver responds to this by turning any sugar it can get its hands on into fat. (There’s plenty of that at this particular moment.)

40 minutes: Caffeine absorption is complete. Your pupils dilate, your blood pressure rises, as a response your livers dumps more sugar into your bloodstream. The adenosine receptors in your brain are now blocked preventing drowsiness.

45 minutes: Your body ups your dopamine production stimulating the pleasure centers of your brain. This is physically the same way heroin works, by the way.

60 minutes: The phosphoric acid binds calcium, magnesium and zinc in your lower intestine, providing a further boost in metabolism. This is compounded by high doses of sugar and artificial sweeteners also increasing the urinary excretion of calcium.

>60 minutes: The caffeine’s diuretic properties come into play. (It makes you have to pee.) It is now assured that you’ll evacuate the bonded calcium, magnesium and zinc that was headed to your bones as well as sodium, electrolytes and water.

>60 minutes: As the rave inside of you dies down you’ll start to have a sugar crash. You may become irritable and/or sluggish. You’ve also now, literally, *ahem* peed away all the water that was in the Coke. But not before infusing it with valuable nutrients your body could have used for things like even having the ability to hydrate your system or build strong bones and teeth.

***

But isn't it a healthy treat?

Friday, July 17, 2015

Blentec blender

[9/18/15] I've been going with the standard: frozen fruit, and/or frozen berries, apple, veggies (spinach and kale) along with coconut milk.  Pretty tasty, most tasty if you drink within a day or so of making it.

It's sweet, not like Suja, but I've kind of gotten addicted to the suja taste which is definitely not sweet, but kind of tangy due to the lemon.  What's in Suja (organic mighty greens)?  apple, celery, cucumber, kale, collard greens, lemon, peppermint tea, spearmint tea, spinach, ginger, spirulina, chlorella, barley grass & alfalfa grass.

Then I was looking at Joe Cross' mean green juice recipe, the one he drank on Fat, Sick, and Nearly Dead.  The ingredients: cucumber, apple, celery, kale, lemon, ginger.  All ingredients in Suja.  [10/8/15 - youtube]

So let's try that.  Even though Joe juiced it, I'm going to try to blend it and see how it turns out.  I think I'll add a little water too.

Bought the ingredients at Safeway (lemon, ginger, cucumber, celery -- I already had apples from Costco).  Turned out to be like 12 bucks.  We'll see how many serviings it pumps out.  And how it tastes.

Here goes...

I think I'll go with a half recipe for starters.  Half-a-cucumber.  I'll peel off some of the skin since it has a bitter taste. Two celery stalks.  One apple.  Don't have kale, so I'll just throw in some spring mix.  1/4 lemon (peel and all, Joe leaves on the peel though the recipe says to peel it, it says to peel here, but I read somewhere that you don't have to peel.  Here it is, page 12 of his book), 1/2 inch ginger.  Put in a little water, about 1/3 cup.

Start it up on low, then switch to medium.  Looks a little thick, so I added a little more water.  So I have about 1/2 cup in there.

Try some.  Doesn't taste that great.  Can definitely taste the ginger.  And a little of the lemon.

Let's add some ice and some frozen fruit...

I guess a little better.  Not that great.  Drinkable I suppose.  Kind of pulpy.  Maybe because of the lemon peel.

***

[tried a couple new recipes today, well it wasn't written down but I just tried it]

Silk, greek yogurt, frozen berries, frozen fruit, a little greens.

Turned it on and a few seconds later it seemed like nothing was moving although I could hear the noise of the motor.  Turned it off.  Somehow it turned out to be almost like ice cream.  Scooped it out.  Not bad.  Berry ice cream.  Almost.

Then tonight, I tried silk, no yogurt, frozen fruit, the last of the greens (was getting a little slimy anyway, but I kind of rinsed it..)  Hey pretty good.  Kind of a fruit shake.  The silk (vanilla flavor) gave it that sweet taste.  This is the tastiest one that I've made yet.

***

Finally decided to get a Blentec blender.  I had been thinking of getting a NutriBullet which my sister has and likes, but she got it on sale at Costco and it's no longer at the sale price.

Meanwhile, the lady demo person was back and her ice cream was tasty.  Plus there was a customer there looking who said she has a Blentec.  I asked her how she likes her Blentec and she said she loves it.  She had a Vitamix but the Blentec is easier to clean.  Plus the Vitamix blades are sharp.

Plus I remember Bobby Smith telling me that Kekoa bought a Blentec which they use.  So if it's good enough for him..

Plus it was $50 off the Costco price of $299.  I think the last time I saw the Vitamix at Costco it was selling for $450 or thereabouts.  Plus it's Costco.  Easily returnable.

[Looking online, I see Amazon is selling the Blentec for $329.  The Vitamix 5200 is $499.99 at Costco.com.   $529.95 at Amazon.]

OK, go for it.  It's the Classic 570 model.

Now to get the ingredients.

I want to make a green smoothie, so I went around looking for green smoothie recipes.

I already had some apples from Costco, so I wanted a green smoothie using apples.

Anyway, first you need a liquid.  Coconut milk is a suggested item.  I decided on water.  OK, I have that.

The green part comes from veggies.  I figured kale or spinach was healthy.  And I saw a bag of kale, spinach, and chard.  I don't know what chard is, but spinach and kale together?  OK, I'll take it.  [Taylor Farms Organic Superfood Power Greens: Chard, Kale & Spinach.  It's "Healthy and Delicious."]

How about the fruits (beside the apple).  At first I was going to get the frozen mixed berries, but there was a demo of mango, pineapple, strawberry, papaya.  Didn't taste too bad.  OK, I'll get that.  [It's the Wawona Festival Blend.]

This recipe had cucumber in it.  So I bought a bag of baby cucumbers.

***

OK, open the box.  It comes in a nice box, well packed.

There's only three parts to it.  The base (with the motor), the jar, and the cover to the jar.  That's it.  Simple enough.

Now to make the smoothie.

Here's Blentec's instructions on how to make a basic green smoothie.  So this is the base instructions.

The recipe is 3 cups cold water, 3 cups leafy greens, 3 cups fresh and frozen fruit.

First add water and greens and pulse 4-6 times to chop the greens.

Then add fruit and select whole juice.  The problem with this instruction is that there's no whole juice button on the blentec.

Looking in the pamphlet there's a recipe for Jolly Green Smoothie

The directions say, "add all the ingredients in the order listed and secure lid.  Select "smoothie".  Simple enough.

So the liquid first (probably doesn't make much difference on the liquid), then the fruit, then the greens, then ice.  Sounds simple enough.

[After I made the smoothie, I see this in the instructions:

For best results, load your ingredients to the jar in this order (unless otherwise stated in the recipe):

1.  Liquids (water, juice, milk)
2.  Soft solids (peanut butter, bananas, and other soft fruits, powders)
3.  Hard, dense, or frozen items (carrots, frozen strawberries, ice)

What about the greens?  From the Jolly Green Smoothie recipe, it goes after the frozen fruit and before the ice.]

[7/20/15 - in this video, greensmoothiegirl puts in the greens first.  So I'd guess it doesn't really make that much of a difference.]

Hopefully this video is an anomaly and it doesn't leak.  Apparently some people have had problems with the rubber gasket leaking.  (If I get this problem, I'll return it to Costco.)

Another problem I heard about is that the vibration makes the blender travel across the counter rather than staying put.

OK, here's a problem before I even start.  The power cord has a three prong plug and is pretty short.  It doesn't even reach from the kitchen table to the floor outlet.

OK, unplug the toaster oven and move it in front of it.

Now I see it's actually four parts.  The cover is actually two parts.  A larger squarish rubber cover with a square hole in the middle where you put a plastic cover piece over it.

OK, let's start.

Two cups of water
one apple sliced
two cups of frozen fruit (actually less since there's a lot of air space between the fruit)
two cups of greens

I'll skip the ice, since the fruit is frozen

OK put the cover on.  And press smoothie.  Here goes...

Nothing.  Ah, there's a power switch in the back of the unit that you have to flip on.

Here goes again...

When I pressed the button, the unit vibrated and jumped and moved a little on the counter.  I grabbed it  After the initial movement it seemed to hop up and down a little but didn't move any more after that.

The whole process took 60 seconds. And everything seemed to blend.

The result wasn't green like in the picture but more brownish green.

OK, now to actually drink the stuff.

First rinse off the cover.
See not all the greens were pulverized as I see a stem floating.  I guess that's minor.  Or a feature, like a mint stem.

Lift off the jar.  Notice no leakage.

Pour into a cup.

Drink.

Hey, not bad.  Not bad at all.  Didn't need any honey or agave as the fruit was sweet enough.  And it was cool, though maybe a few ice cubes wouldn't have hurt.

I'll give it thumbs up for now.

I guess I'll pour the leftover into the suja bottle.

And see how to clean it.

And the demo, they just put water in it and pulsed and it was clean.

The instructions say to "add a cup of water and drop of dish soap to the jar, secure the lid, and pulse for 10 seconds.  Remove and rinse."

Taking my second serving, it wasn't just a stem but the whole sprig with the leafy part pretty much intact.  No problem, I'll just eat it..

Third cup.  OK, getting full.  Fourth cup.  OK, I'm full.

Pour the rest into the Suja bottle.  Not really that much left.

Rinse the jar.  Pretty much rinses off clean.  Don't think I need to pulse it, but I'll do it anyway (without the soap).

It says to pulse for 10 seconds.  I don't know if that means to hold down the pulse button for ten seconds.  Ok just press the button briefly to pulse and do that for ten seconds.  I feel more comfortable doing the latter so as not to strain the motor.  I guess either way.

OK, I guess I'll keep it for now..

[7/18/15]  For my second try, I'll put in some cucumber instead of the frozen fruit to try to approximate the Suja.  Definitely not as sweet as with the fruit or as cold (or as tasty).  I think I'll put in some ice next time.  And maybe a little fruit too.  And maybe one baby cucumber instead of two.

[7/20/15]  OK, back to the fruit.  Water.  Frozen fruit.  1 baby cucumber (peel off the skin).  1 apple slice (take off the skin but leave the seeds).  Power greens.  A few ice cubes.  Hold the unit when I start the cycle so it doesn't travel across the counter.

Yep, much more tasty than without the fruit.

Thursday, July 16, 2015

The Burton-Bruce Connection

Unless you’re deep into the martial arts scene or enjoy sticking around for the end of films just to read obscure movie credits, chances are this is the first time you’re saying the name Burton Richardson in your head and studying his face. That’s good. You should be making mental notes of him, just in case you end up crossing paths in the future and you decide to do something insanely stupid, like challenge him to a fight.

Richardson is an expert martial artist and instructor of multiple disciplines who’s trained many of UFC’s top fighters, including middleweight Chris Leben and film stars such as the late Brandon Lee, son of legendary martial artist, actor and philosopher Bruce Lee. He’s also the founder and president of JKD Unlimited, a functional, street-oriented training school rooted in Bruce Lee’s eclectic system and way of life philosophy known as jeet kune do, or JKD. The training school has approximately two dozen instructors around the globe, with base operations here on Oahu.

And his skill level has commanded the respect of filmmakers, who’ve hired Richardson as a stuntman and fight choreographer for flicks such as Kickboxer 4 and 5, Heatseeker, Fire Down Below with Steven Seagal and The Man in the Iron Mask with Leonardo DiCaprio.

So yeah, he’s a badass – when he has to be. But most times, he’s just a down-to-earth good guy, one who’s quick to smile and slow to anger, unassuming by nature, highly committed to his family and extremely generous in the way he gives of his time in helping others learn, as he puts it, “the ultimate freedom: self-discipline,” and reach what he calls “their unlimited potential.”

“I think martial arts is so important as a self-improvement vehicle because there’s always the other person – an opponent across from you who is actually fighting you and offering resistance,” he says. “Learning to overcome those situations, to get around obstacles, is a big key to living a fulfilling life.

“Ultimately, JKD is not about learning techniques,” continues Richardson, who conducts weekly classes at the Palolo Hongwanji. “It’s learning about yourself and learning to express yourself in an honest way.”

If that last statement sounds awfully Bruce Lee-esque, it’s only fitting since Lee’s life and teachings have been so influential to Richardson.

With this week marking the 72nd year since Lee’s birth, MidWeek has chosen to examine the journey of one man, whose name and face you should now know by heart, and who has masterfully used the teachings of a martial arts legend to elevate both his life and the lives of those around him.

Wednesday, July 01, 2015

Tibetan Buddhism

Buddhism is a made-up religion. This ability to reinvent itself has played an important role in the successful spread of Buddhism. While some religions are still associated with one particular ethnic group or a specific geographical location, Buddhism has transcended such boundaries. What is more, whereas other religions have spread aggressively by force — physical and/or theological — Buddhism has largely cultivated for itself a positive reputation for peace and compassion wherever it has traveled. It has been able to achieve this for the most part because Buddhism has effectively recreated itself to adjust to the local context wherever it has spread.

Tibetan Buddhism is a case in point.

There are certain traits in Tibetan Buddhism that distinguish it from most other forms of Buddhism. To begin with, Buddhism arrived in Tibet rather late when compared to the acceptance of Buddhism in other countries. Buddhism began in India in the fifth century BCE, but did not reach Tibet until roughly 1,000 years later in the seventh century CE. By this time, Buddhism had already established itself elsewhere — Sri Lanka, China, Southeast Asia, Korea, Japan — centuries before. Buddhism entered Tibet from India a second time in the 11th century, introducing yet another form of Buddhism that interacted with the local culture and indigenous religious tradition.

Tibetan Buddhism is largely based on different scriptures from the ones that influenced Buddhism in places such as China, Korea and Japan. In those countries, Buddhist sutras became highly influential, whereas in Tibet other writings, including Buddhist tantras, shaped the religion. Buddhist tantras — intimately connected to esoteric Buddhism — developed in India in the sixth or seventh century CE, long after the time of the historical Buddha. The writings of tantric Buddhism are based on the notion that progress in the path to enlightenment may be hastened through techniques of esoteric ritual and yoga. In tantric Buddhism, the sacred is realized in the ordinary, and the adept can transcend worldly desires by fulfilling them. Spiritually accomplished teachers — known as lamas — reveal these esoteric teachings and practices to qualified disciples.

Lamas are highly revered religious figures in Tibetan Buddhism, and followers give them absolute faith and loyalty. As various Buddhist sects and monasteries in Tibet gained power, the leading lamas also began to wield significant authority, both political and spiritual. But since many of the lamas took vows of celibacy, problems of succession arose. A response to this issue was the rise of the unique Tibetan Buddhist practice of belief in a reincarnate lama. After the death of a great lama, religious elders begin a search to identify the next incarnation of the spiritual master. This practice was developed in Tibet in the 11th century and there are about 3,000 lines of incarnation of various lamas.

Luckily for Tibetan Buddhists and the search committee, the departed spirits of the lamas have tended to be reincarnated in Tibet. While there are numerous lamas in Tibetan Buddhism, the best known is the world-famous Dalai Lama.

The title “Dalai Lama” (Ocean of Wisdom) was created by a Mongolian ruler in the 16th century and bestowed upon a high-ranking lama in one of the Tibetan Buddhist sects. The first Dalai Lama to assume political and spiritual leadership of Tibet was the fifth Dalai Lama. This occurred in 1642 after defeating political and religious rivals — including those of other Tibetan Buddhist sects. From then until 1959, when a revolt broke out against Chinese control of the region, Tibet was ruled by a succession of Dalai Lamas, each male and each identified as a young child after his predecessor had died. The 14th (and current) Dalai Lama escaped to India, where he leads a government in exile. China rejects this government, calling the Dalai Lama and his followers “splitists.”

The second-highest-ranking lama, the Panchen Lama, plays a significant role in identifying the next Dalai Lama. In turn, the Dalai Lama selects the future Panchen Lama. After the death of the 10th Panchen Lama in 1989, the current Dalai Lama recognized a child in Tibet as the 11th incarnation. China rejected this selection — as control of the Panchen Lama can lead to control of the Dalai Lama — and chose a different boy instead. Chinese authorities removed the Dalai Lama’s choice and the boy has not been seen since.

Persecuting religion usually does not weaken it, but invigorates it. China’s attempt to repress Tibetan Buddhism has caused the religion to flourish elsewhere, including in the United States, where it is reinventing itself yet again to appeal to the wider public. The esoteric rituals central to Tibetan Buddhism designed to appease spirits and bring about good luck are downplayed or neglected altogether. Instead, an emphasis on Tibetan Buddhism as a mystical tradition that stresses meditation and logic characterizes the American version of the religion. Reverence for the Dalai Lama, however, remains constant.

In 2011, the Dalai Lama made a shrewd political move by divesting himself of political power. The Dalai Lama also has suggested that he might be reincarnated as a woman or indeed not be reincarnated at all after his death. Such is the privilege that comes with enlightenment to determine one’s own post-mortem fate. The Dalai Lama’s actions have infuriated the Chinese government, as he nullifies the importance of the Chinese-selected Panchen Lama. Many Tibetans, who seek to preserve cherished traditions in their political and spiritual struggle with China, also are troubled by these developments.

The institution of the Dalai Lama is man-made. Its demise also might be the same as Tibetan Buddhism reinvents itself to continue outside Tibet.

-- Jay Sakashita, Midweek, June 24, 2015

Thursday, June 18, 2015

suffering explained

One of the basic functions of religion is to help followers make sense out of ‘non-sense.’ … By providing a why to life, religion enables us to bear almost any how.

I don’t enjoy what I’m good at. I have a knack for choosing the slowest checkout line to stand in at stores. I somehow know which cashier will run out of register tape just when it’s my turn to pay. Even when in a rush, I have an innate ability to find the customers returning merchandise and stand behind them. While I am good at knowing the slowest checkout lines to stand in, I am bad at understanding the questions cashiers ask. I’m too honest, I think.

When I left a 50-pound bag of dog food in the shopping cart and the cashier asked, “Dog food for you?” I answered, “No. It’s for my dog.” When cashiers ask, “Did you find everything you need?” I say, “No, but that’s what religion is for.”

Indeed, religion can make the difficult times bearable, meaningful and even pleasurable.

How does religion do this? One of the basic functions of religion is to help followers make sense out of “non-sense.” As one of my professors was fond of saying, “Religions are meaning producing systems.” Religion offers different models of faith strategies to deal with misfortune and unpleasant situations, transforming the meaningless into something meaningful in the process. By providing a why to life, religion enables us to bear almost any how.

While there are more models than I can cover in a short article, here is a brief look at some of the more common ones I’ve used to rationalize frustrating experiences, both as an overtasked, under appreciated cashier years ago and as a self-centered customer now.

Judicial Model
Suffering is punishment for past transgressions. I am standing in the slowest checkout line because of the bad karma I’ve accumulated or as punishment for sin. I must be patient and endure, and I will be renewed once I emerge from this trial. Besides, it’s better I suffer now in this world than to face judgment in the world to come.

Medicinal Model
Suffering is good spiritual medicine for me. Waiting in line 15 minutes to buy a greeting card will make me a better person. It cleanses my soul. It turns my attention to the divine and opens me up to what is sacred. It’s finally my turn to pay. The cashier now decides to take a break and the new cashier must change register drawers. I recite a mantra. Breathing in, I calm the mind and body. Breathing out, I release the frustration, heal my spirit and smile.

Workout Model
Suffering builds strength of character and spirit. A customer just before me has misread the sale sign but still insists on being right. This is spiritual training, strengthening me for future trials. The cashier calls for a price check, but no one responds. The cashier leaves the register to personally check on the price. I accept this challenging situation because the gods would not have given me more than I can handle. The cashier returns; the customer demands to speak to the manager. I think the gods have overestimated me.

Compassionate Model
Suffering creates a kinder and more understanding person. I feel sorry for cashiers who have to deal with rude customers talking on their phones and treating them like non-entities. I’m indebted to this experience for teaching me the value of compassion. After all, how can we truly know kindness if there were no uncaring, selfish human beings in the world to show us the opposite? I am not alone in my suffering; I feel a bond with the cashier. I make sure I greet my cashier. WE>I.

Magical Curse Model
The one causing me to suffer will get it worse in the end. The anguish I’m experiencing becomes pleasurable when I think of how much worse it will be for the one afflicting me now. A customer has ignored the 10 item limit sign at the checkout. This same person took up two parking stalls in front of the store. Who does this person think (s)he is? This person will suffer greatly in hell. I somehow feel better now.

Ultimate Plan Model
There is a reason for my suffering greater than I can understand. I couldn’t find parking, I chose the shopping cart with a broken wheel, and after all this the item I came to buy is gone. Though life goes in mysterious ways, I’m secure in the thought that there is a greater plan and things will somehow work out in the end.

Grateful Model
My suffering cannot compare to the suffering the founder of my faith endured for me. No matter that the cashier happily chatted away with a co-worker and did not bother to acknowledge me throughout the entire transaction. The world did not acknowledge the founder of my faith either and rejected him outright. Had he not suffered in the way he did, my current situation would be hopeless. I embrace my suffering for sake of the founder of my faith and I’m thankful for the chance to experience a little of what he went through. My pain binds me to my god.

The above models offer different lines of understanding for moving from incomprehensible pain and frustration to meaningful suffering. With proper faith, meaning is possible in and through pain. When it comes to seeking relief from my own suffering, I believe I’m waiting in the right line.

Jay Sakashita teaches religion courses at Leeward Community College and UH Manoa.

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

where the presidential candidates get their money

There will probably be more money flowing into the 2016 presidential race than in any election in U.S. history. The most important new trend is the hundreds of millions flowing into “super PACs” and other outside spending groups, which can accept unlimited amounts from rich donors and spend it on ads and other efforts to support favored candidates or help defeat their opponents.

The gusher of political money flowing from “economic elites” may even endanger democracy itself, according to a recent study by two leading academics, since it concentrates political influence among a small number of billionaires while disenfranchising typical voters.

With crony capitalism and income inequality likely to be prominent issues in the election, Yahoo Finance will track the big donors funding each candidate, and why they might be doing that.

Hillary Clinton. Fundraising tier, out of 3 levels: Highest
Prominent donors: Most of the usual big Democratic givers, including Tom Steyer, Fred Eychaner, James Simons, George Soros, Marc Lasry, Reid Hoffman, Jeffrey Katzenberg and John Doerr.
Advantages: A vast network of rich contacts from her years as a senator and Secretary of State, and of course her husband Bill’s years as president.
Vulnerabilities: Clinton may seem such a shoe-in that donors grow complacent and hold back, leaving her at a funding disadvantage against Jeb Bush or whoever the Republican nominee turns out to be.

Jeb Bush. Fundraising tier, out of 3: Highest.
Prominent donors: Big names in business and finance, such as financier Henry Kravis, New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, Chicago banker Byron Trott, oilman T. Boone Pickens and cellphone pioneer Craig McCaw.
Advantages: Inherits mainstream GOP fundraising network cultivated by his brother George W. Bush, his father, George H.W. Bush, and 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney.
Vulnerabilities: May need to spend a lot of money slogging through drawn-out primary elections.

Scott Walker. Fundraising tier: Middle.
Prominent donors: GOP heavyweights Sheldon Adelson and Charles and David Koch have contributed to Walker as Wisconsin governor and could back him for president (though Walker probably won’t declare his candidacy until early July).
Advantages: Walker’s anti-union crusade in Wisconsin has made him a favorite of conservatives impressed by action as well as talk.
Vulnerabilities: Few voters know much about Walker, which could make him too much of an underdog in the eyes of some donors.

Marco Rubio. Fundraising tier: Middle.
Prominent donors: Oracle’s Larry Ellison, Florida billionaire Norman Braman, Florida sugar baron Jose “Pepe” Fanjul.
Advantages: At 44, Rubio has a bright political future even if he doesn’t win in 2016—perhaps running for Florida governor in 2018. That should attract some donors who wouldn’t otherwise support an underdog.
Vulnerabilities: Could become overdependent on a small number of rich donors.

Ted Cruz. Fundraising tier: Middle
Prominent donor: Hedge funder Robert Mercer of Renaissance Technologies.
Advantages: Cruz is on the far right of the political spectrum, which makes him the favored candidate of many Tea Partiers and ultraconservatives such as Mercer.
Vulnerabilities: Though his wife has been a senior Goldman Sachs executive, Cruz has alienated the business community through efforts to shut down the federal government and other disruptive political tactics.

Lindsey Graham. Fundraising tier: Middle to lowest
Prominent donor: Michael Bloomberg, who donated to Graham’s super PAC as a way of promoting bipartisanship.
Advantages: The South Carolina senator’s hawkish views on the Middle East have strong appeal to Jewish conservatives such as billionaire Sheldon Adelson (who hasn’t yet endorsed a candidate).
Vulnerabilities: Graham’s hawkishness alienates libertarians, independents and (needless to say) most Democrats.

Carly Fiorina. Fundraising tier: Middle to lowest
Prominent donor: Herself. Fiorina spent nearly $6 million of her own money running for the Senate in California in 2010. (She lost.)
Advantages: As the only woman among a male-dominated parade of GOP candidates, Fiorina might emerge as a vice-presidential running mate to Jeb Bush or another frontrunner.
Vulnerabilities. Big GOP donors who supported Fiorina as a Senate candidate—such as T. Boone Pickens, Paul Singer and Ken Griffin—seem likely to back other candidates now that the presidency is at stake.

Rick Perry. Fundraising tier: Middle to lowest
Prominent donors: Texas businessmen Thomas Friedkin and Kenny Trout.
Advantages: Texas, where Perry was governor, is a big state with big money.
Vulnerabilities: Perry’s listless performance as a presidential candidate in 2012 makes a lot of donors wonder why he’s doing it again.

Mike Huckabee. Fundraising tier: Lowest
Prominent donor: Televangelist Kenneth Copeland.
Advantages: The former Arkansas governor, a fundamentalist southern Baptist minister, has a considerable following thanks to his former gig as a Fox News commentator and frequent appearances at Christian gatherings.
Vulnerabilities: Huck, as he’s known, has little appeal beyond Christian conservatives, which is why he ranked 11th in fundraising when he ran for president in 2008.

Ben Carson. Fundraising tier: Lowest
Prominent donor: Harry Bettis, an Idaho rancher who supports Republican candidates and causes.
Advantages: Personal rags-to-riches narrative that could inspire small donors.
Vulnerabiliites: No natural constituency, other than voters who are sick of all the usual candidates.

Rick Santorum. Fundraising tier: Lowest
Prominent donors: Bill Doré and Foster Friess.
Advantages: His supporters tend to be true believers inspired by Santorum’s religious and moral positions.
Vulnerabilities: There aren’t nearly enough of them.

George Pataki. Fundraising tier: Lowest
Prominent donor: He’s desperately seeking one.
Advantages: Three terms as New York governor left Pataki well-acquainted with many East Coast businesspeople, including some top GOP donors.
Vulnerabilities: George who?

Wait! There's one more guy...

the high cost of prescription drugs

The high cost of cancer drugs recently prompted top oncologist Dr. Leonard Saltz to publicly call for limits. "These drugs cost too much," he told thousands of his colleagues at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. Many cancer drugs debut with a price tag of $10,000 a month according to an analysis from staff at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

The country’s largest pharmacy benefits manager, Express Scripts, estimates 576,000 Americans had prescription drug costs above $50,000 last year, up 63% from the year before. The number of patients with costs of $100,000 or more nearly tripled.

Express Scripts put the impact of these costs on payers in the U.S. at $52 billion a year, a number they call unsustainable. They find insurers foot most of the bill but say the costs pressure health insurance premiums and taxpayer-funded government healthcare programs like Medicaid.

Two-thirds of spending for patients with six-figure drug bills went to medications for cancer, hepatitis C and compounded therapies.

So what exactly goes into determining a drug’s price, leading to a price tag in the tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars? 

“First you need to look at the time and cost it takes to develop a medicine, test it, get it approved by regulators, and ultimately bring it to patients," Robert Zirkelbach tells us. Zirkelbach is a senior vice president at the organization, PhRMA, which represents U.S. biotech companies. "You also have to look at the value these medicines provide to patients, the healthcare system and to society broadly."

Developing and winning approval for a new prescription drug is estimated to take more than a decade and cost nearly $2.6 billion dollars, according to Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. That figure factors in the money and time spent on drug development. It also factors in the failures: Data show only 12 percent of medicines that go to clinical trials ever make it to patients.

Monday, June 15, 2015

Bill Gates summer reading list

Last year, there was only one book on my summer reading list that you could reasonably call a beach read. This year I tried to pick a few more things that are on the lighter side. Each of these books made me think or laugh or, in some cases, do both. I hope you find something to your liking here. And if it’s not summer where you live, this list will still be here six months from now…

Hyperbole and a Half, by Allie Brosh. The book, based on Brosh’s wildly popular website, consists of brief vignettes and comic drawings about her young life. The adventures she recounts are mostly inside her head, where we hear and see the kind of inner thoughts most of us are too timid to let out in public. You will rip through it in three hours, tops. But you’ll wish it went on longer, because it’s funny and smart as hell. I must have interrupted Melinda a dozen times to read to her passages that made me laugh out loud.

The Magic of Reality, by Richard Dawkins. Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist at Oxford, has a gift for making science enjoyable. This book is as accessible as the TV series Cosmos is for younger audiences—and as relevant for older audiences. It’s an engaging, well-illustrated science textbook offering compelling answers to big questions, like “how did the universe form?” and “what causes earthquakes?” It’s also a plea for readers of all ages to approach mysteries with rigor and curiosity. Dawkins’s antagonistic (and, to me, overzealous) view of religion has earned him a lot of angry critics, but I consider him to be one of the great scientific writer/explainers of all time.

What If?, by Randall Munroe. The subtitle of the book is “Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions,” and that’s exactly what it is. People write Munroe with questions that range over all fields of science: physics, chemistry, biology. Questions like, “From what height would you need to drop a steak for it to be cooked when it hit the ground?” (The answer, it turns out, is “high enough that it would disintegrate before it hit the ground.”) Munroe’s explanations are funny, but the science underpinning his answers is very accurate. It’s an entertaining read, and you’ll also learn a bit about things like ballistics, DNA, the oceans, the atmosphere, and lightning along the way.

XKCD, by Randall Munroe. A collection of posts from Munroe’s blog XKCD, which is made up of cartoons he draws making fun of things—mostly scientists and computers, but lots of other things too. There’s one about scientists holding a press conference to reveal their discovery that life is arsenic-based. They research press conferences and find out that sometimes it’s good to serve food that’s related to the subject of the conference. The last panel is all the reporters dead on the floor because they ate arsenic. It’s that kind of humor, which not everybody loves, but I do.

On Immunity, by Eula Biss. When I stumbled across this book on the Internet, I thought it might be a worthwhile read. I had no idea what a pleasure reading it would be. Biss, an essayist and university lecturer, examines what lies behind people’s fears of vaccinating their children. Like many of us, she concludes that vaccines are safe, effective, and almost miraculous tools for protecting children against needless suffering. But she is not out to demonize anyone who holds opposing views. This is a thoughtful and beautifully written book about a very important topic.

How to Lie With Statistics, by Darrell Huff. I picked up this short, easy-to-read book after seeing it on a Wall Street Journal list of good books for investors. I enjoyed it so much that it was one of a handful of books I recommended to everyone at TED this year. It was first published in 1954, but aside from a few anachronistic examples (it has been a long time since bread cost 5 cents a loaf in the United States), it doesn’t feel dated. One chapter shows you how visuals can be used to exaggerate trends and give distorted comparisons—a timely reminder, given how often infographics show up in your Facebook and Twitter feeds these days. A useful introduction to the use of statistics, and a helpful refresher for anyone who is already well versed in it.

Should We Eat Meat?, by Vaclav Smil. The richer the world gets, the more meat it eats. And the more meat it eats, the bigger the threat to the planet. How do we square this circle? Vaclav Smil takes his usual clear-eyed view of the whole landscape, from meat’s role in human evolution to hard questions about animal cruelty. While it would be great if people wanted to eat less meat, I don’t think we can expect large numbers of people to make drastic reductions. I’m betting on innovation, including higher agricultural productivity and the development of meat substitutes, to help the world meet its need for meat. A timely book, though probably the least beach-friendly one on this list.

[via twitter]

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Christopher Lee

(CNN) Christopher Lee, the actor, was often the villain.

He played Dracula, the bad guy in the James Bond thriller "The Man with the Golden Gun," the deliciously evil wizard Saruman in the "Lord of the Ring" films, and the dude who fought Yoda with a lightsaber in "Star Wars: Attack of the Clones."

But Sir Christopher Lee, the man, who died this week at the age of 93? Not an ounce of villain to be found, fans and fellow actors alike said Thursday.

"You were an icon, and a towering human being with stories for days," "Lord of the Rings" co-star Elijah Wood tweeted Thursday. "We'll miss you."

Lee died Sunday, a spokesman for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea said.

He had more than 150 film credits to his name, beginning in 1948 and stretching into this decade.

Lee initially made his name in horror films. His first major horror role was as Frankenstein's creature and then the infamous vampire Dracula in a series films for Britain's Hammer Films studios from the 1950s until the 1970s.

Later, he took on the role of James Bond's nemesis Francisco Scaramanga in 1974's "The Man with the Golden Gun," and was introduced to a new generation of film-goers in 2001 with "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring."

In it, he played the evil wizard Saruman, former mentor to Gandalf -- the good-guy wizard's role Lee said he once coveted but had grown too old to play.

The next year, he entered the "Star Wars" universe as the fallen Jedi knight, Count Dooku, in the "Star Wars: The Clone Wars."

Both series brought him renewed fame and acclaim, but for Lee, two roles always stood out: His 1973 turn as Lord Summerisle in the cult classic "The Wicker Man," and his portrayal of the founder of Pakistan, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, in the 1998 film, "Jinnah."

"The most important thing I've ever done," he said in a 2011 forum at the University College Dublin.

Lee was knighted in 2009 -- fittingly on the day before Halloween -- for his accomplishments in the arts. Two years later, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts awarded Lee its highest honor, the Academy Fellowship.

Tuesday, June 09, 2015

Letterman's last show

is still on CBS All Access, but not for long.

But hopefully the clips won't be taken down from youtube.  I think most of the show is actually on the clips.

Let's see...  Let's play the full video and find the youtube clip to match.  That's the plan.

Hmm.  The CBS app on my iPad isn't working.  I'm getting a blank screen then the app exits out.  I see it running in the background but when I bring it up, it's frozen.

Tried turning off the ipad and turning it back on.  Nothing.

Tried freeing up some space on the ipad.  Was down to 200+ MB.  Deleted a video and I'm up to 1.5 GB.  Still not working.

OK delete the app and add it back.  OK, it's running again.

Still have two episodes left online, even without signing into my account.

OK, here goes.

Intro: former presidents announcing "our long national nightmare is over"

entrance

monologue

clip from August 27, 1980 (fire being extinguished on the old show)
not on youtube

good luck to Steven Colbert

conversations with the kids

October 15, 1980, Andy Kaufman on the old show
no clip

Top 10 Things I've Always wanted to say to Dave

June 26, 1980 - dog answering what is the square root of 25?
no clip

what a thrill for that top ten list
no clip

June 17, 1996 - Dave works at Taco Bell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRKSYnku8rw

musical interlude between two series of commercials
no clip

July 9, 1982 - Calvert DeForrest as Santa
no clip

a day in Dave's life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nJw-jPQYVI

the last six weeks have been crazy (Dave's parting words)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq2AZY-qaPY

Foo Fighters (with scenes from old shows)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrVjOUIoo6Q

closing credits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fmpnUj-PjM

***

Letterman's 8th Anniversary Special

Sunday, June 07, 2015

Be Still

Renowned author and travel writer Pico Iyer seemingly had it all by age 29. A Park Avenue apartment in New York, an exciting job writing for Time magazine and the ability to travel the globe. Though his life may have looked like a dream, Iyer says in reality, he was so busy that he never stopped to consider if he was truly happy. Now, the bestselling author says the most important thing we can do for ourselves is to tap into stillness.

By being still -- even for just a few minutes a day -– Iyer believes we can find a deeper connection to the world around us. In fact, he says that finding moments of quiet in our day is as vital to our health and well-being as exercise.

In the above clip from his "Super Soul Sunday" interview, Iyer talks about joining a gym at his doctor's suggestion. Every day, for 30 minutes, he was committed to working on his health. But one day, a simple question posed by a friend gave him pause. "Another friend of mine said, 'Well, why don't you just take 30 minutes quietly? You know, go to the inner health club. Go to the mental health club.'"

At first, Iyer reacted the way most people would to the idea of being quiet and still for 30 minutes a day: "I don't have time for that." But ultimately, Iyer says he realized what he was truly missing. "I've got time to take care of my body -- why am I not taking care of my spirit or my being, which is much more important for my welfare than just building up my muscles or getting my heart going?"

The busier you are, Iyer believes, the more useful it may be to take the time to be still. If you can't afford a full 30 minutes, start small. Even five minutes of stillness can make a difference, he says.

[via twitter]

Saturday, June 06, 2015

The Avengers on Hulu

As noted elsewhere, some episodes of the 60's series The Avengers (starring Patrick MacNee and Diana Rigg) are on Hulu.  But Hulu's episode listing doesn't match the presumedly accurate listing on wikipedia.  So let's reconcile them.

Hulu  Wiki
4-01  4-01  The Town of No Return
4-26  4-26  Honey for the Prince

5-01  5-01  From Venus With Love
5-16  5-16  Who's Who?
5-17  5-17  Return of the Cybernauts
5-24  5-24  Mission Highly Improbable

6-01  5-17  Return of the Cybernauts
6-08  5-24  Mission: Highly Improbable
7-01  6-01  The Forget-Me-Knot

Episode 4-01 was the first episode in which Diana Rigg appeared.  Episode 6-01 was the last episode.  So Hulu has all the Emma Peel episodes.

Going through listings, the episodes match up pretty well.  The confusion is that that they list 40 episodes for season 5 instead of 24.  That's because episodes 1-16 are listed twice.  Episodes 17-24 are listed once for season 5.  But then are listed again as Season 6, episodes 1-8.  So all of season 5 is listed twice.  And finally Season 6, episode 1 is listed as season 7, episode 1.

I see there was a long break between episode 16 and episode 17 of season 5.  Episode 16 aired on 5/6/67.  Episode 17 aired 9/30/67.  So there's some justification for Hulu listing it as a separate season.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

removing skin tags

I have a skin tag on one of my cheeks (yeah that one).  I wonder if any of these home remedies would work?

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Letterman to retire in 2015

[5/19/15] A subversive legacy

[via facebook]
[5/20/15] Letterman's 33-year journey from cult hero to late-night institution
[5/20/15] Leno to appear on last show?
[5/20/15] Political guests
[5/19/15] Prickly late-night innovator
[5/19/15] what's next for the staff?
[5/19/15] interview with Paul Shaffer
[5/19/15] The Holden Caulfield of late night TV
[5/19/15] Jimmy Fallon tribute
[5/19/15] the first show
[5/18/15] Entertainment Weekly retrospective

[4/13/14] David Letterman will retire in 2015, the "Late Show" host announced during a taping of his CBS show on Thursday.

According to a statement from his representatives, Letterman said he informed CBS Chairman and CEO Leslie Moonves that he would leave the show at the end of his contract in 2015.

Letterman, who enjoys tweaking his network bosses, said that he told Moonves: "Leslie, it's been great, you've been great, and the network has been great, but I'm retiring."

For his part, Moonves said he appreciates the needling, saying in a statement that he appreciates Letterman's ability to keep "executives on their toes - including me."

"When Dave decided on a one-year extension for his most recent contract, we knew this day was getting closer, but that doesn't make the moment any less poignant for us. For 21 years, David Letterman has graced our Network's air in late night with wit, gravitas and brilliance unique in the history of our medium. During that time, Dave has given television audiences thousands of hours of comedic entertainment, the sharpest interviews in late night, and brilliant moments of candor and perspective around national events. He's also managed to keep many celebrities, politicians and executives on their toes - including me. There is only one David Letterman. His greatness will always be remembered here, and he will certainly sit among the pantheon of this business. On a personal note, it's been a privilege to get to know Dave and to enjoy a terrific relationship. It's going to be tough to say goodbye. Fortunately, we won't have to do that for another year or so. Until then, we look forward to celebrating Dave's remarkable show and incredible talents."

Letterman went on in his announcement to thank those that have worked with him on the show.

"What this means now, is that Paul and I can be married," he said, jokingly referring to longtime band leader Paul Shaffer.

Letterman has been host of the show since 1993, when he moved to CBS after his former network, NBC, opted to hire Jay Leno to take over the "Tonight Show" when longtime host Johnny Carson retired.

His announcement comes on the heels of a major late night shuffle. Jimmy Fallon took over the "Tonight Show" from Leno in February after 22 nonconsecutive seasons, and former "Saturday Night Live" head writer Seth Meyers filled Fallon's old spot at "Late Night" on NBC Feb. 24.

*** [4/28/14]

Stephen Colbert says goodbye on The Daily Show

*** [5/19/15] No Leno on Dave's final show

that takes religion

Why is that the most biased prejudiced and intolerant people are often the most religious?  After all, it's only those with religious faith who condemn others to hell.  They hate in the name of love.

This had led some to take the position that religion is a detriment to society.  It harms us, demeans us and is an insult to human dignity.  As Nobel Prize in Physics winner Steven Weinberg said regarding religion, "With or without it, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.  But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."

Such views have led an increasing number of people to eschew religion altogether and inspired atheists to decry, "Religion poisons everything."

I disagree.

-- Jay Sakashita, Misfit Spirit, Midweek, May 13, 2015

Sunday, May 17, 2015

how to chop an onion

dicing onions does not have to be a tedious task

first cut the tip off
then cut onion in half
peel off the outer skin
slice into three sections
cut right down
slice down (the other way)

here's the video (sponsored on facebook)

a similar video
and another one

***

also how to peel garlic
how to peel tomatoes

Thursday, May 14, 2015

parking for jury duty

Had to report in December.  They give you a handout where you can park.  The problem is you have to find parking first before you get the handout.  Anyway, the info is on the web.  The site contains everything in the handout and more.

Does the court provide parking for jurors?

Yes. Secure and lock your car as the Judiciary is not responsible for any damage or theft of your vehicle. If you choose to drive, please allow yourself extra time to find parking.
  • First Circuit – O’ahu: Parking is limited. You might find it easier to take the bus or have someone drop you off
  • First Circuit Court (777 Punchbowl St.) - You may park in the South Street Garage at the corner of South and Pohukaina Streets, or in the Makai Garage at the corner of Punchbowl and Halekauwila Streets (hours of operation are 7:00 am to 5:00 pm). The court will validate your ticket. Jurors may also park in metered stalls near the courthouse. Do not feed the meters. If you receive a citation for expired metered parking, turn in your citation to the clerk if you are returning the next day or mail it in the envelope your clerk has provided. Check for restrictions such as tow away and no parking zones. The court will not be held responsible for anyone who violates such parking restrictions. More information about parking is provided on the summons and during your orientation.
  • District Court (1111 Alakea St.) – Same as First Circuit. Parking is also available in the municipal lots. Get a receipt from the parking lot attendant and submit the receipt to the court for a refund. The average cost of parking in municipal lots is about $20.
(In my case, I walked.)

DC's Legends of Tomorrow

Just got this on Facebook.  Apparently DC's answer to The Avengers.  At least the TV answer.  The movie answer will still be the Justice League.

Google for a story.  OK, here's one.

The CW has released the first look at DC's Legends of Tomorrow, the new series spinning out of Arrow and The Flash and starring Brandon Routh (The Atom), Caity Lotz (Canary) and Victor Garber (Firestorm) in roles from those shows.

Maybe things are getting a little too weird, but still kind of cool.  Didn't see Supergirl in there though.

OK, I better catch up on season two of Arrow.  Then hope season three comes out on Netflix before this hits.

***

I'd say DC is far ahead of Marvel on TV.

Monday, May 11, 2015

spend your money on experiences

Most people are in the pursuit of happiness. There are economists who think happiness is the best indicator of the health of a society. We know that money can make you happier, though after your basic needs are met, it doesn't make you that much happier. But one of the biggest questions is how to allocate our money, which is (for most of us) a limited resource.

There's a very logical assumption that most people make when spending their money: that because a physical object will last longer, it will make us happier for a longer time than a one-off experience like a concert or vacation. According to recent research, it turns out that assumption is completely wrong.

"One of the enemies of happiness is adaptation," says Dr. Thomas Gilovich, a psychology professor at Cornell University who has been studying the question of money and happiness for over two decades. "We buy things to make us happy, and we succeed. But only for a while. New things are exciting to us at first, but then we adapt to them."

So rather than buying the latest iPhone or a new BMW, Gilovich suggests you'll get more happiness spending money on experiences like going to art exhibits, doing outdoor activities, learning a new skill, or traveling.

Gilovich's findings are the synthesis of psychological studies conducted by him and others into the Easterlin paradox, which found that money buys happiness, but only up to a point. How adaptation affects happiness, for instance, was measured in a study that asked people to self-report their happiness with major material and experiential purchases. Initially, their happiness with those purchases was ranked about the same. But over time, people's satisfaction with the things they bought went down, whereas their satisfaction with experiences they spent money on went up.

It's counterintuitive that something like a physical object that you can keep for a long time doesn't keep you as happy as long as a once-and-done experience does. Ironically, the fact that a material thing is ever present works against it, making it easier to adapt to. It fades into the background and becomes part of the new normal. But while the happiness from material purchases diminishes over time, experiences become an ingrained part of our identity.

Thursday, May 07, 2015

STEM majors

The differences in starting salaries for STEM majors versus those who study the humanities have been widely publicized. Now a new study looks at how those differences add up over a lifetime of earnings – and the results are staggering.

The lowest-paid graduates, early-childhood education majors, earn just $39,000 annually midcareer, while the highest-paid, petroleum engineering majors, make an average of $136,000 per year. Over a career, that difference amounts to more than $3 million, according to the report The Economic Value of College Majorsby economists at Georgetown University.

Among the major fields of study, architecture and engineering students earn highest average salary -- $83,000 per year -- and education majors earn the lowest -- $45,000 per year.

The study finds that generally it’s still worth it to go to college. The average bachelor’s degree holder makes $1 million more over a lifetime than a person with just a high school diploma.

A separate report released last fall by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that the value of a bachelor’s degree has reached an all-time high of around $300,000. Researchers found that it takes about 10 years to recoup the cost of a degree, a historically low level, down from close to 25 years in the late 1970s and 1980s.

Tuesday, May 05, 2015

what to wear?

The capsule wardrobe movement is far from mainstream. But, elevated in the social consciousness by some high-profile personalities, more and more people are applying minimalist principles to their fashion.

Many people outside the movement remain skeptical. They wonder why anybody would intentionally choose to wear the same outfit every day—especially when financial resources are not in question.


Evaluating my personal experience with a minimal wardrobe and studying recent profiles in various publications, I have created this list of reasons.

[Yeah, I guess so.  But the reason I've worn the same shorts every day for three months is because I'm lazy.  And I like the shorts.  I do change my tee-shirt though.  And my underpants -- most of the time...]

care home bill deferred

Noboru Kawamoto, 94, and his wife of 67 years, Elaine, 88, will continue to live in care homes miles apart in Windward Oahu after the state Legislature was unable to pass legislation to allow them to live in the same home.

Noboru Kawamoto, who must live in a community care foster family home because of his health, pays for his care without using Medicaid. Elaine Kawa­moto also pays for her care without Medicaid. They are called private-pay individuals.

The problem is that state law does not allow two private-pay individuals to live in one community care foster family home.

House Bill 600 would have allowed that to happen for two years until the Health Department came up with rules, but the measure failed to clear conference committee and is dead for this year.

The Kawamotos, who attended Friday's conference committee meeting, were devastated that the bill did not pass.

After lobbying throughout the legislative session, Noboru Kawa­moto thought the measure would pass to help not only them, but other couples in the same situation.

"I thought that was a sure thing," Kawa­moto said in a somber tone shortly after Friday's meeting.

A veteran of the 100th Battalion, 442nd Regimental Combat Team, who served in World War II, Kawa­moto resides in a community care foster family home in Kane- ohe. Elaine Kawa­moto lives in an adult residential care home in Puna­luu.

Last fall, Noboru Kawa­moto was hospitalized after he became ill with a urinary tract infection. He then suffered a stroke, leaving him weak on his right side.

Kawamoto, who has to use a wheelchair, also has polyneuropathy, a degenerative disease that affects the peripheral nerves.

His wife, who also uses a wheelchair, had suffered from congestive heart failure and a series of ailments. Their son, Norman, drives her to Kane­ohe on the weekends so the couple can spend time together.

Norman Kawamoto said he too was shocked by the deferral. "I just couldn't believe it," he said. "My dad, you could just see the hurt in his eyes."

He described how much his parents miss each other.

"Just simply being together and eating together is a joy for them," he said.

The bill is still alive in conference committee, and action possibly could be taken in the next legislative session. Under state law, only one private-pay individual and two Medicaid recipients can reside in the same community foster family home.

Sen. Suzanne Chun Oakland (D, Downtown-Nuu­anu-Li­liha) said, "I'm hoping we can work during the interim with the departments of Health and Human Services, see if they can actually draw up rules, because that takes quite a while."

Keith Ridley, chief of the Department of Health's Office of Health Care Assurance, which licenses long-term care facilities, said, "We'll still continue to work with legislators as well as the Department of Human Services on how we can make this work."

Ridley said there were options such as adult residential care homes or expanded adult residential care homes that are available to couples who are private-pay individuals like the Kawa­mo­tos.

But Norman Kawa­moto said his father underwent a medical evaluation in an attempt to live in the same adult residential care home as his wife and was rejected because of the level of care he needed. The care home would have to add more staff to care for Noboru Kawa­moto, said his son.

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

the solution to inequality

Between 2000 and 2013, every single state in the United States saw its share of middle-class families shrink, according to analysis from the Pew Charitable Trusts. In some states like Wisconsin and Ohio, that number fell by more than 5 percentage points; middle-income families now make up less than half of those states' populations.

It’s not a new narrative but the modern story of inequality goes much deeper than stagnant wage growth. It's inequality of opportunity as well.  It's something Nobel-prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has studied and written about a great deal. He talks with Yahoo Finance Editor-in-Chief Andy Serwer in the video above.

In his new book, “The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them,” Stiglitz traces the modern divide of inequality back to the Reagan era. Though inequality was a huge problem at the turn of the last century and in the lead up to the Great Depression, Stiglitz says the income divide in the U.S. was reduced after World War II and that the country “grew at its fastest pace” and “grew together.” He says the turning point was the Reagan Administration and its rolling out of supply-side economics, deregulation, and lower tax rates. The goal of these policies was to spur economic growth overall and make everyone wealthier. Stiglitz says it caused a divide instead.


In his book, Stiglitz offers three ways to bridge this growing inequality gap. First, he says, reform the tax and transfer system in the U.S. to “make it at least fair that those at the top pay at least the same share,” that we don’t have these distorting provisions which weaken the economy and create more inequality.

Second, Stiglitz says we need to look at the basic structure of the economy and our laws and regulations. It is “the way our economy works that creates this inequality,” he says. Stiglitz points to “ineffective and ineffectively-enforced” anti-trust laws and corporate governance laws that, he says, allow those at the very top to seize a larger and larger share of the corporate pie. As a result, that leaves “less for investment, less for wages.” He says it's a structural problem that needs to be fixed because "effectively every law and regulation is tilted to create an untilted field."

And finally, Stiglitz says, we need to provide equal access to education to bridge the inequality divide. “We spend more even in the public school on the children of the rich than we do the poor,” he says. This has long-lasting effects. “We are transmitting advantages and disadvantages across generations, and that is the most important factor in creating this inequality of opportunity.”

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Phantom Menace review

Brushwood mentioned this in the latest CordKillers (67).  He said the Phantom Menace wasn't all bad.  If it weren't for the Phantom Menace, we wouldn't have the Phantom Menace Review from Red Letter Media.

He said he's watched this way more times than the actual movie.

Fairly entertaining if you don't mind a few swear words thrown in periodically.  (Or maybe you find swear words entertaining..)

***

Red Letter Media is pretty amusing (to me).  Their Wheel of the Worst for example.

Monday, April 20, 2015

ranking the presidents

RantPolitical ranks the presidents,  George W. Bush is ranked just ahead of Obama.

There have been 43 presidents.

43. Andrew Johnson
38. Herbert Hoover
37. Jimmy Carter
36. Obama
35. George W. Bush
31. Gerald Ford
30. Nixon.  "The reality is Nixon was a good president, aside from his criminal activity of course."
18. George H. W. Bush
16. Lyndon Johnson
15. John F. Kennedy
14. Clinton.  "He was willing to compromise and get things done."
9. Reagan
8. Eisenhower.  Established DARPA which would give birth to the internet
7. Truman
5. Thomas Jefferson
4. Theodore Roosevelt.  He was a naturalist who gave us many of our National Parks.  Ordered construction of the Panama Canal
3. Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  His New Deal is often credited with ending the Great Depression which was truly ended by WWII.
2. George Washington.
1. Abraham Lincoln.  There was a lot that he did that was considered unconstitutional.

***

Checking wikipedia.  Lincoln, FDR, Washington are consistently ranked at the top of the lists.

In 2012, Newsweek magazine asked a panel of historians to rank the ten best presidents since 1900. The results showed that historians had ranked Franklin D. Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Dwight Eisenhower, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, and Barack Obama as the best since that year.

A 2013 History News Network poll of 203 American historians, when asked to rate Barack Obama's presidency on an A–F scale, gave him a B- grade. Obama, whom historians graded using 15 separate measures plus an overall grade, was rated most highly in the categories of communication ability, integrity, and crisis management, and most poorly for his relationship with Congress and transparency and accountability.

A 2015 poll, administered by the American Political Science Association among political scientists specializing in the American presidency, had Abraham Lincoln in the top spot, with George Washington, Franklin Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Bill Clinton, Andrew Jackson, and Woodrow Wilson cracking the top 10.

*** [7/19/15]

Obama up to #18?

Friday, April 17, 2015

Dr. Oz on agave

I noticed during the Blentec demo that the demonstrator was putting in agave (I think it was).  I assumed because (1) the product needed sweetening and (2) agave was healthier than other sweeteners (like honey).

Well, Dr. Oz chimes in.

Over the past few months, I’ve become increasingly concerned about a sweetener that I’ve recommended on my show in the past. After careful consideration of the available research, today I’m asking you to eliminate agave from your kitchen and your diet. Here’s why.

We used to think that because agave has a low-glycemic index and doesn’t spike your blood sugar like regular sugar does, it would be a good alternative for diabetics. But it turns out that although agave doesn’t contain a lot of glucose, it contains more fructose than any other common sweetener, including high-fructose corn syrup. Initially, we thought moderate amounts of fructose weren’t unhealthy, but now we know better.

When you eat fructose-rich agave, your body does not release nearly as much insulin as it does when you eat regular sugar. This can affect how your body releases a hormone called leptin, which helps to control appetite. At the same time, experts believe that fructose is converted into fat more rapidly than glucose is. This can lead to several alarming consequences. The first is that people who eat a lot of agave are at risk for weight gain, especially belly fat. The second is that agave may actually increase insulin resistance for both diabetics and non-diabetics.

In addition, fructose poses a danger to your cardiovascular system and could increase your risk for metabolic syndrome and heart disease. Unlike glucose, fructose can only be broken down in the liver. As it gets metabolized, uric acid and free radicals form, which can trigger inflammation and damage cells. Plus, one of the most dangerous final products of fructose metabolism is triglycerides, which can contribute to the fatty arterial plaques responsible for cardiovascular disease. High triglycerides are particularly dangerous for women, whose risk for cardiovascular disease rises three times as much for every single unit increase in triglycerides compared to men.

But fortunately, agave is not the only natural sweetener you can turn to when you have to satisfy your sweet tooth. Raw honey has less fructose than most agave and is the only natural sweetener with other health benefits, which include anti-microbial, heart-healthy and anti-inflammatory effects. It has even been shown to help soothe a cough as well as, if not better than, many over-the-counter cough syrups. I love honey so much that I even harvest my own, but you can find raw organic honey at your local supermarket. However, keep in mind that no infants under the age of one should eat raw or pasteurized honey.

***

Or maybe I was thinking of stevia?